Europe’s Automakers Grapple With New Emissions Standards, While Gas Guzzlers In Cali Can Rest Easy

co2piechartcopy.gif

While EPA honcho Stephen L. Johnson spent last week thwarting the attempts of California and 16 other states to adopt measures limiting automobile emissions, the European Union is taking unprecedented steps of its own to limit the carbon footprint of cars sold within its countries’ borders.

According to an article published in last week’s Economist (“Collision Course”; Dec. 22, 2007), the EU is about to adopt “the world’s strictest CO2-emission standards”. By 2012, new cars sold in the EU must meet an emissions threshold of 130 grams of CO2 per kilometer; at present, European-made cars average about 160 g/km. The European Commission will also recommend the imposition of a fine of $137 per car per gram over the 130g/km limit. While this standard will undoubtably present a problem for all of Europe’s car manufacturers, the most vociferous protests are emanating from German luxury car giants BMW and Mercedes-Benz. Vehicles produced by these two companies average in the range of 184 g/km and 188 g/km respectively, about $7,000 in fines per car above the proposed threshold. In contrast, French and Italian automakers Citroen, Renault and Fiat — all whose fleets are “heavily biased towards fuel-efficient small cars” — average 142-147 g/km per car.

However, the ultimate form that this legislation will take is not yet settled. German auto lobbyists have pushed for a special “weight dispensation” that will provide relative emissions allowances for heavier cars; much to the dismay of environmental activists, the European Commission has agreed in principle. Ultimately, though, by focusing this emissions cap on cars sold in Europe rather than on cars manufactured, this mandate may do little to curb global greenhouse gases, as the main markets for both BMW and Mercedes lie abroad — mainly in the US, Russia and China, all countries whose clean-air standards still leave much to be desired.

Meanwhile, the attempts of California and other states to adopt their own clean-air initiatives are being stonewalled. Despite the recent deservedly-lauded legislation set to increase fuel efficiency in US-manufactured vehicles by as much as 40% by 2020, the California ruling unfortunately demonstrates the current administration’s continued reticence to recognize the global environmental crisis. It’s probably no coincidence that Johnson rendered his decision only after the latest round of Vice-President Cheney’s confabs with auto lobbyists, where Cheney purportedly promised to kill the California bill in exchange for industry support on the federal bill. Though EU officials seem willing to take an albeit limited lead on emissions reduction, the Bush administration continues to send mixed signals to the global community, slapping itself on the back with one hand for passing legislation it never wanted in the first place, while surreptitiously removing the bill’s teeth with the other.


Posted on Friday, January 4th, 2008 at 12:00 pm | Tagged in Global Warming, Legislation, Pollution | posted by Bill

AddThis Social Bookmark Button   Print Print   Email Email